 |
Observer-Reporter forum
Observer-Reporter discussion forums
|
Important Notice:
We regret to inform you that our free phpBB forum hosting service will be discontinued by the end of June 30, 2024.
If you wish to migrate to our paid hosting service, please contact billing@hostonnet.com.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
phonyfeminazi
Expert
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7819
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:36 pm Post subject: STATE OF EMERGENCY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
 |
|
Nobel "Peace" Prize winner, Al Bore, contacted Nobel "Peace" Prize winner Osama Obama that help was on the way.......Al Bore is sending some of his GLOBAL WARMING to the NORTHEAST, to counter some of that mysterious "GLOBAL COOLING" they are experiencing.....
_________________
Exposing the secular humanist liberal "progressives". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amphikalein
Journeyman
Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 3177
Location: Corrales, NM
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That would be why the phenomenon is more accurately called global climate change. And extremes of weather (both colder and warmer) have been part of the predictions for decades.
_________________
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." ~Martin Luther King Jr.
"May we, in our dealings with all the peoples of the earth, ever speak the truth and serve justice." ~Dwight D. Eisenhower
Amphy's blog | Proud Member NDA |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phonyfeminazi
Expert
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7819
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Amphikalein wrote: | | That would be why the phenomenon is more accurately called global climate change. And extremes of weather (both colder and warmer) have been part of the predictions for decades. |
Oh, so we're backing off that AL BORE claim of GLOBAL WARMING.
_________________
Exposing the secular humanist liberal "progressives". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cylinsier
Master
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 13229
Location: Oh shi-
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Al Gore's original claim was that climates would cool in areas. From day one. The whole focus on warming as the only outcome of climate change is just you being an idiot.
_________________
The end is nigh! OR forums die APRIL 1. Don't lose contact! Join the forums at bogsource.com now! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amphikalein
Journeyman
Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 3177
Location: Corrales, NM
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| phonyfeminazi wrote: | | Amphikalein wrote: | | That would be why the phenomenon is more accurately called global climate change. And extremes of weather (both colder and warmer) have been part of the predictions for decades. |
Oh, so we're backing off that AL BORE claim of GLOBAL WARMING. |
No, not 'backing off' anything. It's only some of the media and yahoos like you who persist in reducing climate change to only the buzzwords 'global warming''.
_________________
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." ~Martin Luther King Jr.
"May we, in our dealings with all the peoples of the earth, ever speak the truth and serve justice." ~Dwight D. Eisenhower
Amphy's blog | Proud Member NDA |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phonyfeminazi
Expert
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7819
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cylinsier wrote: | | Al Gore's original claim was that climates would cool in areas. From day one. The whole focus on warming as the only outcome of climate change is just you being an idiot. |
Oh, you mean like this:
Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of Earth's near-surface air and oceans since the mid-20th century and its projected continuation. Global surface temperature increased 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) between the start and the end of the 20th century.[2][A] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century was caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases resulting from human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation.[2] The IPCC also concludes that variations in natural phenomena such as solar radiation and volcanism had a small cooling effect after 1950.[3][4] These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more than 40 scientific societies and academies of science,[B] including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.[5]
Climate model projections summarized in the latest IPCC report indicate that the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F) during the 21st century.[2] The uncertainty in this estimate arises from the use of models with differing sensitivity to greenhouse gas concentrations and the use of differing estimates of future greenhouse gas emissions. Most studies focus on the period up to the year 2100. However, warming is expected to continue beyond 2100 even if emissions stop, because of the large heat capacity of the oceans and the long lifetime of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.[6][7]
An increase in global temperature will cause sea levels to rise and will change the amount and pattern of precipitation, probably including expansion of subtropical deserts.[8] Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic and would be associated with continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects include increases in the intensity of extreme weather events, species extinctions, and changes in agricultural yields. Warming and related changes will vary from region to region around the globe, though the nature of these regional variations are uncertain.
Political and public debate continues regarding global warming, and what actions (if any) to take in response. The available options are mitigation to reduce further emissions; adaptation to reduce the damage caused by warming; and, more speculatively, geoengineering to reverse global warming. Most national governments have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
_________________
Exposing the secular humanist liberal "progressives". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amphikalein
Journeyman
Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 3177
Location: Corrales, NM
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nah, more like this, from NASA:
| Quote: | The Earth's climate has changed throughout history. Just in the last 650,000 years there have been seven cycles of glacial advance and retreat, with the abrupt end of the last ice age about seven thousand years ago, marking the beginning of the modern climate era —and of human civilization. Most of these changes are attributed to the very small changes in the Earth’s orbit changing the amount of solar energy the Earth receives.
The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years.
Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. Studying these climate data collected over many years reveal the signals of a changing climate.
Certain facts about Earths climate are not in dispute:
* The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century. Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many JPL-designed instruments, such as AIRS. Increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.
* Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in solar output, in the Earth’s orbit, and in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.
Global sea level rose about 17 centimeters (6.7 inches) in the last century. The rate in the last decade, however, is nearly double that of the last century.
Levels of Carbon Dioxide are higher today than at anytime in past 650,000 years.
Scientists reconstruct past climate conditions through evidence preserved in tree rings, coral reefs and ice cores. For example, ice cores removed from 2 miles deep in the Antarctic contain atmospheric samples trapped in tiny air bubbles that date as far back as 650,000 years. These samples have allowed scientists to construct a historical record of greenhouse gas concentration stretching back hundreds of thousands of years.
All three major global surface temperature reconstructions show that Earth has warmed since 1880. Most of this warming has occurred since the 1970s, with the 20 warmest years having occurred since 1981 and with all 10 of the warmest years occurring in the past 12 years. Even though the 2000s witnessed a solar output decline resulting in an unusually deep solar minimum in 2007-2009, surface temperatures continue to increase. |
And from the EPA:
| Quote: | | Climate is defined not simply as average temperature and precipitation but also by the type, frequency and intensity of weather events. Human-induced climate change has the potential to alter the prevalence and severity of extremes such as heat waves, cold waves, storms, floods and droughts. Though predicting changes in these types of events under a changing climate is difficult, understanding vulnerabilities to such changes is a critical part of estimating vulnerabilities and future climate change impacts on human health, society and the environment. |
And from Phony's own quote:
| Quote: | | Other likely effects include increases in the intensity of extreme weather events |
_________________
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." ~Martin Luther King Jr.
"May we, in our dealings with all the peoples of the earth, ever speak the truth and serve justice." ~Dwight D. Eisenhower
Amphy's blog | Proud Member NDA |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phonyfeminazi
Expert
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7819
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaa hahahahahahaha
NICE TRY, AMPHY.....but I pulled that directly out of Wikipedia, before you LIBCHIT socialist pigs had a chance to CHANGE your stories.....
Once it was discovered that you WORLD SOCIALISTS were found out to be nothing but FIRST CLASS LIARS, you idiots had to CHANGE your story....
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I LOVE IT.......GOTTA LOVE IT WHEN LIBCHITS ARE CAUGHT WITH THEIR LIARS' PANTS DOWN......
_________________
Exposing the secular humanist liberal "progressives". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amphikalein
Journeyman
Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 3177
Location: Corrales, NM
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So you're saying that Wikipedia is more reliable than data-based reports from NASA or the EPA?
You should have your physician check the continuing decline of your brain function.
Don't confuse your feeble comprehension of science with what you wrongly perceive to be a change in my 'story'.
_________________
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." ~Martin Luther King Jr.
"May we, in our dealings with all the peoples of the earth, ever speak the truth and serve justice." ~Dwight D. Eisenhower
Amphy's blog | Proud Member NDA
Last edited by Amphikalein on Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phonyfeminazi
Expert
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7819
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Amphikalein wrote: | So you're saying that Wikipedia is more reliable than data-based reports from NASA or the EPA?
You should have your physician check the continuing decline of your brain function. |
Oh, that's right....Wikipedia is only reliable when it suits the LIBCHITS bullchit rhetoric.....RIGHT, AMPHY???
Why are you so easy, tonight???
Snow storm get you off your game????
_________________
Exposing the secular humanist liberal "progressives". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amphikalein
Journeyman
Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 3177
Location: Corrales, NM
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i didn't say that Wikipedia was unreliable. i'm only suggesting that if you think it's more reliable than sourced reports by NASA and the EPA, then you're further off your rocker than i previously thought.
And i live in New Mexico. It was sunny & nearly 50 degrees here today.
_________________
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." ~Martin Luther King Jr.
"May we, in our dealings with all the peoples of the earth, ever speak the truth and serve justice." ~Dwight D. Eisenhower
Amphy's blog | Proud Member NDA |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phonyfeminazi
Expert
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7819
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Amphikalein wrote: | i didn't say that Wikipedia was unreliable. i'm only suggesting that if you think it's more reliable than sourced reports by NASA and the EPA, then you're further off your rocker than i previously thought.
And i live in New Mexico. It was sunny & nearly 50 degrees here today. |
Okay, let's take NASA...
World Book at NASAText Size
Global Warming Global warming is an increase in the average temperature of Earth's surface. Since the late 1800's, the global average temperature has increased about 0.7 to 1.4 degrees F (0.4 to 0.8 degrees C). Many experts estimate that the average temperature will rise an additional 2.5 to 10.4 degrees F (1.4 to 5.8 degrees C) by 2100. That rate of increase would be much larger than most past rates of increase.
Scientists worry that human societies and natural ecosystems might not adapt to rapid climate changes. An ecosystem consists of the living organisms and physical environment in a particular area. Global warming could cause much harm, so countries throughout the world drafted an agreement called the Kyoto Protocol to help limit it.
Causes of global warming
Climatologists (scientists who study climate) have analyzed the global warming that has occurred since the late 1800's. A majority of climatologists have concluded that human activities are responsible for most of the warming. Human activities contribute to global warming by enhancing Earth's natural greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect warms Earth's surface through a complex process involving sunlight, gases, and particles in the atmosphere. Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are known as greenhouse gases.
The main human activities that contribute to global warming are the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) and the clearing of land. Most of the burning occurs in automobiles, in factories, and in electric power plants that provide energy for houses and office buildings. The burning of fossil fuels creates carbon dioxide, whose chemical formula is CO2. CO2 is a greenhouse gas that slows the escape of heat into space. Trees and other plants remove CO2 from the air during photosynthesis, the process they use to produce food. The clearing of land contributes to the buildup of CO2 by reducing the rate at which the gas is removed from the atmosphere or by the decomposition of dead vegetation.
A small number of scientists argue that the increase in greenhouse gases has not made a measurable difference in the temperature. They say that natural processes could have caused global warming. Those processes include increases in the energy emitted (given off) by the sun. But the vast majority of climatologists believe that increases in the sun's energy have contributed only slightly to recent warming.
_________________
Exposing the secular humanist liberal "progressives". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cylinsier
Master
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 13229
Location: Oh shi-
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wasn't talking about NASA. I was talking about what Gore himself said.
_________________
The end is nigh! OR forums die APRIL 1. Don't lose contact! Join the forums at bogsource.com now! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phonyfeminazi
Expert
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7819
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cylinsier wrote: | | I wasn't talking about NASA. I was talking about what Gore himself said. |
According to Gore’s climatespeak, global warming theory can be validated by record cold temperatures just as easily as warmer temperatures. Do most scientists really believe this? In a word, no.
Thousands of scientists worldwide reject Gore’s version of global warming theory. More than 17,000 of them have signed a petition saying no convincing scientific evidence supports the theory of catastrophic global warming, nor is there evidence to link human activities to such warming. You can read the petition for yourself at http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p37.htm.
These scientists and other global warming skeptics, argued Gore, have all been deceived by an evil force called The Polluters. “They are the targets of a massive and well-organized campaign of disinformation lavishly funded by polluters who are determined to prevent any action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming, out of a fear that their profits might be affected,” Gore said.
_________________
Exposing the secular humanist liberal "progressives". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phonyfeminazi
Expert
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7819
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More than 17,000 of them have signed a petition saying no convincing scientific evidence supports the theory of catastrophic global warming, nor is there evidence to link human activities to such warming. You can read the petition for yourself at http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p37.htm.
These scientists and other global warming skeptics, argued Gore, have all been deceived by an evil force called The Polluters. “They are the targets of a massive and well-organized campaign of disinformation lavishly funded by polluters who are determined to prevent any action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming, out of a fear that their profits might be affected,” Gore said.
This is more climatespeak. Scientists who feed the climate change scare stand the best chance of collecting the billions of dollars in government grants allocated for global warming research every year, and scholarly journals are more apt to publish their articles. Environmental groups raise billions of dollars each year by featuring global warming in their newsletters and fundraising letters.
Even big energy companies, like Enron, have actively lobbied the federal government to cap greenhouse gas emissions and adopt an emissions credit trading system, because they are well-positioned to earn additional profits from such trading. Some big petroleum companies, like BP and Shell, lobby for greenhouse gas emission caps that would increase the value of their natural gas holdings.
_________________
Exposing the secular humanist liberal "progressives". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
